Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
Many people believe that the Apollo Moon landings were faked.
There are many official "facts" that suggest man did land on the Moon and indeed did walk on the Moon.
However, there are many theorists who have provided information what they consider proves that it was not possible to land on the Moon at that time.
It is believed by the theorists that because there was a mad rush to get to the Moon first, everything was faked.
NASA, they believe, could not actually make it so they used a Hollywood style film studio in Area 51 to create it all.
The official line is that humans did walk on the Moon in 1969.
If man did go to the Moon, why then do we have far too many counter arguments to suggest it didn't happen?
Video footage allegedly shot on the Moon is grainy but many theorists suggest that was deliberate so abnormalities can't be made out. Anyone who has seen the Apollo Project Archives will notice how everything is crisp. Theorists suggest that many images were doctored.
Despite the grainy video, the theorists have pointed out many unexplained phenomena, in particular the lighting.
I have provided a video to show arguments for and against the Moon landings, see what you think.
Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
Re: Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
No matter what people say, I still think man did land on the Moon in 1969!
Well, in my mind I am 99% certain, so I think I will keep a small part open to allow me to investigate evidence to the contrary.
I am open minded on most things but I like to come to some conclusion.
I really can't see there being a Hollywood Style film set in Area 51 and the Moon landings being shot there.
There are far too many people involved let alone the Apollo astronauts themselves.
Why have we never had a whistle-blower?
Also, if there was any doubt about man landing on the Moon why did Russia or China not complain?
If the whole thing was fake then somebody would have offered proof.
Man did land on the Moon and they done so with very primitive technology.
Any small country could get a man on the Moon now but the trouble is there's no reason to do that.
It would be a pointless exercise unless they are going to set up a base there for scientific purposes.
Well, in my mind I am 99% certain, so I think I will keep a small part open to allow me to investigate evidence to the contrary.
I am open minded on most things but I like to come to some conclusion.
I really can't see there being a Hollywood Style film set in Area 51 and the Moon landings being shot there.
There are far too many people involved let alone the Apollo astronauts themselves.
Why have we never had a whistle-blower?
Also, if there was any doubt about man landing on the Moon why did Russia or China not complain?
If the whole thing was fake then somebody would have offered proof.
Man did land on the Moon and they done so with very primitive technology.
Any small country could get a man on the Moon now but the trouble is there's no reason to do that.
It would be a pointless exercise unless they are going to set up a base there for scientific purposes.
I am free and they will not tell me otherwise
- Robin Hood
- Assistant Admin
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2015 1:16 am
Re: Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
My opinion is that man did get to the moon in the sixties.
I like to see the counter-arguments though.
Some are valid indeed, like the shadows and the American flag waving where there is no atmosphere.
Whatever the truthers say, there appears to be an answer from the "experts".
Why would the USSR not confront the Americans if they thought that it was all staged?
My opinion is that man did walk on the moon as and when they say it happened.
I like to see the counter-arguments though.
Some are valid indeed, like the shadows and the American flag waving where there is no atmosphere.
Whatever the truthers say, there appears to be an answer from the "experts".
Why would the USSR not confront the Americans if they thought that it was all staged?
My opinion is that man did walk on the moon as and when they say it happened.
Re: Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
Did man land on the Moon?
Oh I don't know
There are some good arguments for and some good arguments against.
Oh I don't know
There are some good arguments for and some good arguments against.
Keep the bastards honest.
Re: Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
It didn't happen in 1969.
America couldn't get man on the moon then so they did stage it.
The radiation would have killed the astronauts.
I have an open mind and always will, however.
America couldn't get man on the moon then so they did stage it.
The radiation would have killed the astronauts.
I have an open mind and always will, however.
Re: Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
The problem of going to the moon up there was that the radiation would have killed them.
It is well known that the radiation would have bombarded them with dangerous levels and they wouldn't have survived it all.
Maybe nowadays they have a solution but in 1969 - never!
I keep an open mind on the subject but the arguments against the moon landings of that era are far too strong and the replies are not good enough.
It is well known that the radiation would have bombarded them with dangerous levels and they wouldn't have survived it all.
Maybe nowadays they have a solution but in 1969 - never!
I keep an open mind on the subject but the arguments against the moon landings of that era are far too strong and the replies are not good enough.
Re: Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
Has it happened since thoughCrab wrote:It didn't happen in 1969.
Re: Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
Possibly, but with so much suspect information, will we ever get the truth?Rodders wrote:Has it happened since thoughCrab wrote:It didn't happen in 1969.
Keep the bastards honest.
Re: Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
Things were a lot more primitive in 1969 when the Moon landings supposed to have taken place.
They will have been on the project for years.
Now then, radiation would have been a major factor in the project.
How did they manage to overcome that with no previous experience?
They will have been on the project for years.
Now then, radiation would have been a major factor in the project.
How did they manage to overcome that with no previous experience?
- Freeman Bob
- Released
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:07 pm
- Location: In the fridge
Re: Did Man Really Land On The Moon In 1969?
I don't think they got to the moon in 1969 but what bugs me is the radiation thing
If radiation is such a problem how come Richard Branson is proposing "normal" people will be able to go into space on his spaceships in the near future?
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-new ... il-7399434
If radiation is such a problem how come Richard Branson is proposing "normal" people will be able to go into space on his spaceships in the near future?
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-new ... il-7399434