Corrupt Court System: Introduction

The courts are there to ensure that if you break the Common Law, you receive a form of punishment. Likewise, if someone has hurt you or your family in some way, you would like to see them in court. Therefore, the courts are necessary to serve justice when someone breaks the common law; this we all understand. But it is a corrupt court system!

The Common Law helps humans to live side by side in peace. However, when that peace breaks down, you can ask the courts for remedy. Before you read on, ensure that you have read the differences between Lawful and Legal. There is a massive difference; in fact, you could say that they are opposites of each other.

We are simplifying things here because otherwise we would have to write thousands of pages. Just remember that if you appear in court for anything that does not come under Common Law, then it will be a civil matter and contracts will be the basis.

The Oaths (UK)

Just like our section on The Police, we will start with the oaths of office. Read these because it is important to understand their oaths. Once you understand their oaths, you can play their games far better—and win them!

Magistrates/Judges Oath: “I, […….] do swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs and successors, according to law.”

In addition to the above oath, a judge swears this oath too: “I, […….] do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of… and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will.”

Take note of the most important part of their oaths of office that we highlight in red. Indeed, understand those bits, and you can win them hands down in most cases.

When judges or magistrates are sitting high up there, it is important to ensure they are acting under their oath. Don’t ask them if they have taken an oath of office because they must have to be in that position.

You must ask them, for and on the record, of course, “Are you willing to stand under your oath while listening to ALL the evidence, considering ALL the evidence, and making a final decision?” Then, when you establish this, and only then, will you get real justice.

The Corrupt Court System: Legal Manipulation and the Marginalization of Common Law

The court systems around the world, particularly in countries like the UK, Canada, and the USA, have long been upheld as symbols of justice and fairness.

However, a deeper examination reveals a disturbing reality: these institutions are often steeped in corruption and operate less as impartial arbiters of justice and more as instruments for extracting wealth under the guise of legal procedure.

This corruption is compounded by the fact that most courts are not primarily engaged in addressing true criminal acts under Common Law but instead operate under Maritime Law to adjudicate civil and commercial cases, often for profit.

The Problem with Legal Cases in the Corrupt Court System

In an ideal system, all courts would handle criminal cases, ensuring that individuals who commit genuine harm against others are held accountable.

However, the majority of cases in today’s courts do not involve criminal activity but rather civil disputes, regulatory breaches, and contractual disagreements. These cases often hinge on arbitrary laws, complicated legal jargon, and the exploitation of individuals who lack the resources to navigate the system effectively.

Fines, fees, and court costs in non-criminal cases disproportionately affect low-income individuals, further entrenching inequality. A person fined for a minor regulatory infraction may face financial ruin if they cannot pay, while corporations or wealthy individuals often escape with negligible penalties for far graver offences.

Innocent or Guilty?

Only you can decide whether you should plead guilty or not guilty, of course. However, if you are guilty of breaking the common law, then much of the following might not apply to you.

If you have broken the Common Law and want to plead guilty, forget about the oaths of office. This is because you don’t want to stir these people up, especially if what you did is indefensible. So, just plead guilty and show remorse. This way, your sentence may be more lenient, and you will leave the court much quicker.

Of course, should you be defending a case under Common Law, don’t involve their oaths either. This is because you don’t want to stir them up, and you should have enough evidence necessary to defend yourself properly.

The Law

In all cases, you must understand the difference between common law and admiralty law. This is because most court cases do not come under common law. This is why the oaths of office are very important for you to remember.

So, the following information is only applicable to all cases that doesn’t involve the Common Law. Of course, common law cases are all about harm, loss, fraud, and breach of the peace ONLY, nothing more and nothing less.

The Shift from Common Law to Maritime Law

Historically, courts were designed to uphold Common Law, which is rooted in natural justice and moral principles. Common Law focuses on protecting individuals from harm, theft, and fraud. If someone breaks these principles, they should indeed face justice.

However, the current global judicial system has largely shifted its focus from punishing criminal acts under Common Law to resolving legal cases rooted in Maritime or Admiralty Law, a system designed to govern commercial and contractual disputes.

This shift has transformed many courts into profit-driven entities, prioritizing the collection of fines, fees, and settlements over genuine justice. It is under Maritime Law that non-criminal offences—such as regulatory violations, traffic infractions, and unpaid debts—are tried, often penalizing individuals without any direct harm or criminal intent.

A Global Perspective: Corrupt Courts Worldwide:

The UK: Disregard for Justice

In the UK, the judiciary has faced criticism for its opacity and lack of accountability. Reports of judicial bias and conflicts of interest are not uncommon. For instance, cases involving large corporations and financial institutions often see rulings disproportionately favouring those with economic clout, undermining the principle of impartiality.

A notable example is the handling of financial scandals like the Libor rate-rigging case, where banks were accused of manipulating interest rates. Despite clear evidence, penalties were disproportionately lenient, and individuals at the top levels of management often escaped significant consequences.

Canada: The Exploitation of Indigenous Peoples

Canada’s court system has been plagued by systemic corruption and favouritism, particularly evident in its treatment of Indigenous communities. The residential school settlement processes highlighted how courts often served government interests rather than justice.

Survivors seeking compensation for the abuse they endured were frequently met with bureaucratic hurdles, inadequate settlements, and dismissive attitudes, revealing a system more focused on limiting liability than addressing harm.

USA: A Profit-Driven System

The United States is infamous for its privatized prison-industrial complex, where profit motives influence judicial decisions. Judges have been implicated in scandals, such as the “Kids for Cash” case in Pennsylvania, where two judges were found guilty of accepting kickbacks from private detention centres in exchange for sentencing minors to disproportionately harsh penalties.

Such cases underscore how the court system can be manipulated to prioritize monetary gain over justice.

Corrupt Court System: Fake Courts

There are many different types of courts, which we are familiar with, of course. However, ALL courts should be common law courts only. Indeed, there should be no other type of law court whatsoever. After all, the law is simple to understand, and the courts are there to serve justice to human beings who break it. But there are many types of courts, and we need to deal with them from time to time.

Common Law Courts are there to serve justice when someone breaks the Common Law. But, because most cases have no relation to Common Law, they are NOT REAL COURTS. Indeed, they are nothing but a place of business for people to rob you of your money. So, take note of this deception in the corrupt court system before we move on.

A common law court is what it says it is, and we accept this. However, since most cases do not come under common law, how can the claimant use the courts? Well, they don’t; it is trickery in order to intimidate you. Everything will look official, and even the usher will call you into court number 4 or whatever, but they are NOT common law courts.

In other words, it is part of the big deception. It is a system in which they are going to try and take your money off you. So you have to be on your guard and defend yourself against the deceit.

Court Summons

A court summons is only an invitation to the corrupt court system. So, turn up willingly if you have broken or are defending a common law situation. However, in any other situation, attend only under duress. But in all cases, arm yourself with the information you need.

In the section above, you will need to understand that breaking the Common Law is wrong. You can defend your actions if you wish, but you can also show remorse and get it over with. This is fine, but most invitations to court have no real standing. In fact, they could be unlawful. So, you need to stay calm and try and understand why you have an invitation to their “court.”

Your invitation to most courts is an invitation to do business with them. You can of course decline their offer, but usually that is a bad move. This is because they want your money and will use all their “power” to get it. So, by not attending, they will make an order in your absence.

Magistrates’ Courts

Almost all criminal cases start in magistrates’ court, but the magistrates’ powers have their limitations. For example, they can only sentence people to a maximum of six months imprisonment. So, in a serious case, the magistrates will refer this to the Crown Court, whose powers are greater.

The magistrate’s court is there to deal with matters on the cheap and usually deals with summary offences. However, they should still deal in common law only, but they don’t. So, ensure they are standing under their oath as we describe above. The magistrates will want you to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. If you plead not guilty, then they will arrange a date for a trial.

There is also the “no case to answer” plea if you feel that the prosecution evidence is flimsy.

Criminal v Civil in the Corrupt Court System

Breaking the common law is a criminal offence, for example, hurting another human being. People go to the Common Law courts, which they all are, and thrash things out. However, what about the civil matters? Also, how are people getting a criminal record for offences where there is no victim?

Civil matters should not take place in a common law court because these are for common law cases. But they use their trickery, of course, and they use the intimidating surroundings of a court to make it look official. We also assume that those who serve in a court have some form of authority over us. Then they use the dreaded Legalese (a language that looks like English, but isn’t)!

But, when you have these people standing under their oaths of office, they must uphold the law (Common Law). If you haven’t broken the law, why are you even there? For example, you are up at court for travelling 35mph in a 30 zone at 2am, and there is no victim of any sort. What! We did say it was a corrupt court system, and they are only after your money.

The Winning Person

A person can be a human being, or in a legal capacity, a person can be a company. So, in court we have a case, Thieving Gas Company v John Smith. John has ensured that the judge or magistrates are standing under their oaths; John should now win his case. This is because their oaths are “according to law” and there is only one law—Common Law. So, there is no victim in John’s case; why is he even in court?

In a higher court, John would clearly win his case as well. This is because their oaths say quite clearly, “I will do right to all manner of people.” The plural of person is persons and NOT people, so the judge must do right by John. After all, the Thieving Gas Company can’t come under the grouping of people, but they can come under the grouping of person.

This court scam is widespread, and it’s just a business. The judges can rent a room in a court, and they make money from your misery. Indeed, it is in their interest to ensure that the Thieving Gas Company wins. The odds are not in your favour in these fake courts. But they look like a court, don’t they?

Of course, people fighting those that are just after your money will need courage and determination. Indeed, they are going to make it difficult for you every step of the way. You are a free man, but they will make you look like a slave—fact!

Corrupt Court System: Working Against You

You are free to read our posts or leave the Freeman Movement website at any time.

The Way Forward: Lawful Rebellion

The principles of the Freeman on the Land movement emphasize a return to Common Law and a rejection of Maritime Law’s overreach. Lawful rebellion, as an assertion of individual sovereignty, calls for citizens to challenge the legitimacy of systems that prioritize profit over justice. It advocates for an overhaul of the judicial system, demanding transparency, accountability, and a refocusing on genuine criminal cases.

By educating ourselves and others about the differences between Common Law and Maritime Law, we can begin to resist the exploitative practices of corrupted courts. Criminals who violate Common Law should face fair punishment, but non-criminal offences should not be exploited for monetary gain under the guise of legal proceedings.

Corrupt Court System: In Conclusion

The global judicial system, particularly in the UK, Canada, and the USA, has deviated from its original purpose of delivering justice. Instead, it operates as a mechanism to extract wealth and protect powerful interests, often at the expense of ordinary citizens.

The corruption inherent in these systems underscores the urgent need for reform and a return to the foundational principles of Common Law. Through awareness, resistance, and lawful rebellion, we can challenge the status quo and reclaim the justice that these courts were meant to provide. In all cases, always remembe that you have the right to rebel agains anyone who thinks they rule over you!